Book online today or if you need any assistance or help
choosing the right course for you, please call our team on 08000 199337 and
we will help point you in the right direction.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of mobile technology, the demand for proficient mobile application testers is higher than ever. The ISTQB (International Software Testing Qualifications Board) Mobile Application Testing course, culminating in the prestigious Certified Mobile Application Tester (CMAT) certification, is meticulously designed to equip professionals with the knowledge, skills, and competencies required to excel in the dynamic field of mobile application testing.
The Certified Mobile Application Tester (CMAT) provides an insight into methods, techniques and tools a professional may use to test mobile applications. It is also for professionals who are planning to start implementing mobile projects or are working within companies that plan to do so.
The certification for the ISTQB Mobile Application Testing Foundation Level is accredited by UKITB. It is intended for professionals who are working with mobile technology.
The certification provides an advantage for those who would like to know the required mobile project activities, roles, methods, and methodologies specific to their role. The course is accredited by the UKITB and rated at level 3 in SFIA
Who is the course for?
The Certified Mobile Application Tester (CMAT is aimed at anyone involved in software testing who wishes to broaden their knowledge of Mobile Application Testing or anyone who wishes to start a specialist career in Mobile Application Testing.
Next Steps: Follow-on Courses After CMAT Certification
After achieving the CMAT (Certified Mobile Application Tester) qualification, individuals keen on furthering their expertise in software testing can consider the following ISTQB courses and certifications to enhance their skill sets and career opportunities:
Core Stream Modules
These modules are technology, methodology, and application domain-agnostic, building directly on the knowledge acquired at the Foundation Level.
Specialist Stream
For those looking to specialise further, this stream offers courses focusing on specific quality characteristics, test approaches, test activities, or industry-specific testing knowledge.
These certifications are designed to cater to various interests within the field of software testing, allowing professionals to specialise further and enhance their careers. Each course builds on the foundational knowledge acquired through the CMAT qualification, enabling a deeper understanding and expertise in specialised areas of testing.
Learn more about the ISTQB Mobile Application Testing Course
This video will provide you with insights into methods, techniques and tools a professional may use to test mobile applications. Business and technology drivers, common test types, mobile app platforms and automation and test execution.
The Mobile Application Testing Foundation Level exam is multiple choice. There are 40 questions. To pass the exam, at least 65% of the questions (i.e., 26 questions) must be answered correctly. Hands on objectives and exercises will not be examined.
Exam is included in the price
Mobile Application Testing Objectives
Certified Mobile Application Testers who have passed the Foundation Level “Certified Mobile Application Testing” exam should be able to accomplish and demonstrate the following Business Objectives:
Understand and review business and technology drivers for mobile apps in order to create a test strategy
Identify and understand the key challenges, risks and expectations associated with testing a mobile application
Apply test types and levels specific to mobile applications.
Apply common test types, such as those mentioned in ISTQB® Certified Tester Foundation Level syllabus 2018, in the mobile specific context.
Carry out the activities required specifically for mobile application testing as part of the main activities of the ISTQB® test process.
Identify and use suitable environments and appropriate tools for mobile application testing.
Understand methods and tools specifically to support mobile application test automation.
Certified Mobile Application Testers should be able to demonstrate their skills in the following areas:
Describe how available mobile analytics data can be used as input for the test strategy and the test plan.
Distinguish between various business models for mobile applications.
Recall different types of mobile devices.
Distinguish between different types of mobile applications.
Distinguish between general architecture types of mobile applications.
Apply characteristics and specifics of the mobile market in preparing a test strategy.
Give examples of the challenges associated with testing mobile applications.
Describe how risks specific to mobile applications may be mitigated.
Describe device-specific features and hardware which should be considered for testing.
Prepare tests for the app’s compatibility with screen sizes, aspect ratio, and screen density.
Describe how tests can show the potential effects of device overheating on the system under test.
Recall different test types for testing of the various input sensors used in mobile devices.
Recall tests to be run for various input methods.
Describe how tests can reveal user interface issues when changing screen orientation.
Prepare tests for an app using typical mobile device interrupts.
Prepare tests for changing the access permissions to the device features requested by the app.
Prepare tests to verify the impact of an app on a device’s power consumption and the impact of its power state on the app.
Prepare tests for the handling of notifications by the system under test.
Describe how tests can verify correct functionality of quick-access links.
Prepare tests for the impact on an app of the user preference settings provided by an operating system.
Distinguish between different tests required for native, web and hybrid applications.
Recall tests required for apps which are available on multiple platforms or operating system versions.
Recall tests required for co-existence and interoperability with other apps.
Summarize the tests for connectivity testing, including those across networks, when using Bluetooth and when switching to flight mode.
Prepare Installability tests for mobile apps.
Prepare stress tests for mobile apps.
Give examples of security issues related to mobile apps.
Recall time and resource behaviour considerations for mobile apps.
Prepare usability tests for mobile apps.
Recognise the type of tests required for database testing of mobile apps.
Summarise the tests required for internationalization (globalization) and localization testing of mobile apps.
Summarise the need for accessibility testing in mobile application testing.
Mobile Application Testing Syllabus – Key points
FAQ’s
What is the ISTQB Mobile Application Testing Certification?
The ISTQB Mobile Application Testing Certification (CMAT) validates your expertise in mobile device and app testing methods, techniques, and tools, demonstrating your insight into this specialised field.
Who is the target audience for the ISTQB Mobile Application Testing Certification?
This certification is ideal for software testers, test analysts, engineers, consultants, managers, user acceptance testers, and developers involved in mobile app quality. It's also beneficial for project managers, quality managers, and IT directors needing knowledge in mobile testing.
Are there prerequisites for the ISTQB Mobile Application Testing Certification?
Yes, candidates must have obtained the ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level certificate before attempting the Mobile Application Testing Certification
What content does the Mobile Application Testing Certification cover?
The certification syllabus includes mobile project activities, roles, methods, methodologies, test strategy creation, challenges in mobile applications, application of test types, and the use of tools for test automation
What is the format of the ISTQB Mobile Application Testing exam?
The exam consists of 40 multiple-choice questions, to be completed in 60 minutes. Non-native English speakers may receive a 25% extended time.
What are the benefits of obtaining the ISTQB Mobile Application Testing Certification?
Achieving this certification can enhance your software testing skills, provide global recognition, increase job opportunities, and add credibility to your professional profile.
Can I retake the ISTQB Mobile Application Testing exam if I fail?
At TSG Training, we know that preparing for an exam can be a stressful endeavour. That’s why we offer a unique promise to our customers – if you don’t pass your exam the first time around, you can take one subsequent course at no cost! Exam re-takes are chargeable
What career opportunities can this certification open up?
This certification is highly regarded in the mobile technology sector. It can make you more attractive to employers, enhancing your career in areas such as mobile app development, quality assurance, and project management.
Are there any advanced certifications available after obtaining the Mobile Application Testing Certification?
Yes, after achieving this certification, you may choose to proceed to other Core, Agile, or Specialist stream certifications offered by ISTQB to further specialize and advance in your career.
How can I register for the ISTQB Certified Mobile Application Testing course and exam?
Decide on the Delivery Method: Begin by selecting your preferred mode of learning. You have the option to choose between virtual (online) courses or traditional, in-person classroom courses. Consider your learning preferences, schedule, and location to make the best decision for your needs.
Select the Exam Format: After deciding on your course delivery method, choose the format of the exam you wish to take. The ISTQB Certified Mobile Application Testing exam is typically available in both online and paper-based formats. Your choice might depend on the availability, convenience, or your comfort with test-taking environments.
Complete the Payment: Once you have made your selections, proceed to payment. You can pay for the course and the examination fee using various methods, including credit card, bank transfer, or a purchase order. Ensure that you have all the necessary information and authorisation if using a purchase order or bank transfer.
48 reviews for ISTQB Certified Mobile Application Testing (CMAT)
Rated 5 out of 5
Roxanne Green| Test Analyst|ReAssure –
The course was really good, definitely would like the practical side of it to help inbed the detail a little more and have some hands on experience. Theory side of it was intense but really informative and retained a good pace with examples along the way to help apply the information.
Rated 5 out of 5
Mitchell Munter | | –
Well presented and good feedback when going through the mock exams.
Rated 5 out of 5
Faye Harrison | Systems Delivery Specialist | The Best Connection Group Ltd –
Great course and excellent tutor. John was really welcoming and I immediately felt comfortable. The pace at which he did his lectures was perfect. The content was really detailed and I learned lots of useful theory
Rated 4 out of 5
Izzy Smith | Junior QA Analyst | TMAC –
Interesting course, good detail & nice practical uses
maybe update some of the slides to more relevant examples/ applications
Rated 5 out of 5
Simon Evans | QA Software Test engineer | DAC Beachcroft –
Really useful and interesting
Rated 5 out of 5
Yat Wan | Test Lead | Royal Mail Group –
Trainer has been informative, provided good examples related to theory, and helped me go over where I went wrong in the past paper.
Perhaps more organised setup for delegates in installing and using Android Studio, before course started.
Rated 4 out of 5
Daniel Phillips | Automation Engineer | Capgemini –
Course was interesting, but practical work didn’t always seem to align with the examinable content – on day 1 a lot of the content was gone over relatively quickly in favor of doing practical work around drawing diagrams. What was implemented on day 2 was better, theory was taught first and then backed up by relevant practical work afterwards.
Rated 5 out of 5
Danny Yau | Application Tester | Steve Vick International –
Course was great, Rosie was very helpful and always explaining everything in detail.
Rated 5 out of 5
james troup | software test engineer | IBM –
I thought that our trainer was very good, she was very helpful and the amount of information was a good amount and not overpowering.
Rated 5 out of 5
Luke Rogers | Software Test Engineer | IBM –
It was very enjoyable and insightful, the information from the trainer helped relate the course information into real world scenarios easily to help understand the details of the course.
Rated 5 out of 5
Susie Harrison | Software Test Engineer | IBM –
The course was interactive and fun
Lots of information but was not overwhelming
Rated 5 out of 5
Abdulelah Alkhorayef | Quality assurance | Elm –
A little bit out dated
Rated 5 out of 5
Kristian Easton|Test Engineer|IBM –
She was a really good speaker and went into really good detail on examples and explanation and got everyone involved
Rated 5 out of 5
Elton Araunjo|Software test engineer|IBM –
The course was excellent and was able to increase my knowledge bank in test. The course also helped my build on the knowledge that i gained from the foundation course, by helping me understand how testing take place on a mobile app.
Rated 5 out of 5
Joe Dobson|Test Engineer|IBM –
Really good course, and really explained by a fun instructor. Angelina got us involved however possible and made sure were all comfortable with the pace and info before moving on. She also showed us a demo at the end which was very interesting. Hope to have Angelina teaching me again in future.
Rated 5 out of 5
Sunny Yang | Digital Consultant | KPMG –
Angelina was very helpful in answering our questions and keeping everyone engaged throughout the whole 4 days. I believe it would be better to keep it as 4 days (I heard some of these run for three days only), and perhaps it would be easier to use Microsoft Teams instead of GoTo Meetings? As we use Teams as our primary source of communication within the organisation anyway.
Rated 4 out of 5
Ana Ferreira | Business Tester | Siemens –
Good structure, nice explained
Rated 5 out of 5
Ana Cavaco | Software Tester | Siemens SA –
Really useful and with connection to the real world, not just academic knowledge
Rated 5 out of 5
Mauricio Geraldelli | | Siemens Portugal –
Great course, but too many info for 2 days (as usual). It will take some time to review and process the content.
Rated 5 out of 5
Joaquim Fragoso | SW Test and Automation expert | Siemens SA –
Very comprehensive. A reference for mobile testing world
Rated 5 out of 5
James Anderson | QA Tester Apprentice | Invotra LTD –
The course was very informative and help me learn more about mobile app testing. The course was informative and fun and the trainer was motivating and was very helpful in explaining the syllabus.
Rated 5 out of 5
Patrick Wilson | Test Analyst | IBM –
Lovely person, very approachable with a deep understanding of the topic, allowing Angelina to explain the content in a way that was engaging, and made it easy to digest. It was easy to stay engaged with the content right through to the end, and the overall course quality was very high.
Rated 5 out of 5
Thomas Rey | Junior QA Analyst | Jagex –
As I have only taken the foundation course before I was unsure of what to expect with this course. The foundation course was a lot bulkier but this course felt a lot lighter. _x000D_
_x000D_
As I predominately work with mobile devices in my testing I feel I knew a quite about about some of the topics we discussed but I was able to grow a deeper understanding of areas I knew already and I learnt a lot about areas I didn’t know about. _x000D_
_x000D_
I enjoyed the length of the course it felt just right.
Rated 5 out of 5
peter wilson | software tester | vaultex –
turning the course into a 3 day course be be really good to much info for just 2 days
Rated 5 out of 5
Lee Palmer | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Overall I felt the course could have done with being an extra day in length. We skipped over most of the practical exercies as well as some of the final topic being sped through the make up the time. This seemed due to us asking lots of questions for the first part of the course which meant we were playing catchup_x000D_
_x000D_
I felt on this course I missed out on having the slides/course sylabus as a physical copy in front of me that I could highlight and make notes on. This time around I was having to make notes from the slides and then also make notes about this slides at the same time. This was exhausting and I stuggled to keep up.
Rated 5 out of 5
Ryan Neave | QA Analyst | Jagex LTD –
Course was informative._x000D_
_x000D_
I found that this course, in particular in the second day there was a lot crammed into one day with little time to discuss a great deal of things._x000D_
_x000D_
If it was spread over 3 days I believe it would have been digested a lot better.
Rated 5 out of 5
Amparo Baviera Vivó | IT Test coordinator | European Parliament –
The trainer was very competent. For every concept she explained and put examples to help to understand. The course material is also complete.
It was a little bit difficult to me to follow the speed rate of an English native speaker, but that it’s another story. I enjoyed the course.
Rated 5 out of 5
Alexander Hendrick | Software Test Apprentice | IBM –
The course was intensive but very interesting. Angelina came at it with a positive attitude and did well explaining the material in detail. She was very patient with us and got through the course material in a good time.
Rated 5 out of 5
George Selway|Software Tester Apprentice|Sedgemoor District Council –
It was easy to follow and the instructor was very friendly and patient.
Rated 5 out of 5
Toni Lampert | Apprentice Software Tester | Booking.com –
It is very informative and allowed you to highlight the areas that you need to study in more detail for the exam. At times we would get lost in the practical that doesn’t relate back to the exam
Rated 5 out of 5
Duncan MacGregor | IT Technician | OS –
Course was excellent, well paced, superb instructor and feel like I learned a lot.
Rated 5 out of 5
Darrell Cole | QA | MoneyBox –
Good overview plenty to learn lots of Fun
Rated 5 out of 5
Marc Ackermans|| –
I couldn’t hope for a better trainer! Being a non English native speaker I was afraid the course would have been a big challenge but Angelina has made this course for me easy to understand making sure I wasn’t left behind. She has clarified each doubt and on top of that she’s also good fun. I hope I will meet Angelina in a future course.
Rated 5 out of 5
Mark Whitby|Head of Development and Testing|InHealth Intelligence –
Course was excellent. The trainer was energetic and engaging.
Rated 5 out of 5
Madelaine Helleur O’Connor|Graduate Data and Technology Consultant|KPMG –
I was very happy with the way the course was presented._x000D_
By asking everyone questions during the course Angelina made sure we all stayed focused (at lease it worked for me).
Rated 4 out of 5
Kieran Hooper|Business Consultant|IBM –
The course is quite clear, sometimes a bit internet connection issue. The content is quite good
Rated 5 out of 5
Joshua Lovejoy|Test Analyst|University of Southampton –
Angelina was very knowledgeable and presented the course with lots of energy and humour.
Rated 5 out of 5
Colin McNairney|Test Automation Specialist|IBM UK –
Course was very good, but difficult for me to follow as I am deaf in both ears and had difficulty keeping up with what was going on. I depend mainly on text and slides, but suffered some confusion as I did not have context in some situations.
Rated 5 out of 5
Thomas Collins|Software Tester|Aareon –
Angelina was very friendly and approachable, she was happy to answer any queries that I had as we went along. I was initially a bit worried about remote learning, but things went very well. Angelina tried to make the course as interactive as possible, even though I know that it is hard to do this remotely. Thanks Angelina 🙂
Rated 5 out of 5
Sophie Pearson|PTP Business Analyst|Old Mutual Wealth –
It is very informative and allowed you to highlight the areas that you need to study in more detail for the exam. At times we would get lost in the practical that doesn’t relate back to the exam
Rated 5 out of 5
George Selway|Software Tester Apprentice|Sedgemoor District Council –
It was easy to follow and the instructor was very friendly and patient. There was a great case study to follow with linked tasks.
Rated 5 out of 5
George Selway|Software Tester Apprentice|Sedgemoor District Council –
It was easy to follow and the instructor was very friendly and patient. There was a great case study to follow with linked tasks.
Rated 5 out of 5
Duncan MacGregor|IT Technician|OS –
Course was excellent, well paced, superb instructor and feel like I learned a lot.
Rated 4 out of 5
Darrell Cole|QA|Moneyhub –
Good overview plenty to learn lots of Fun
Rated 5 out of 5
Attila Pal|Data administrator|Randstad –
I had a virtual course between 18-20 May and really enjoyed it. I had already prepared from a book but John, the trainer, helped me with topics I was not confident in. In my opinion, the course was well structured and interactive enough – we had optimal break times, practiced sample questions, had explaining discussions and Q-A sessions all 3 days. It was better than just reading the book, I understood the material more because of visualising and pointing out the major correlations. I took my exam 2 days after this course and had 90% (probably around 20-25% more than if preparing from the book only)!
Rated 5 out of 5
Joe Verlander | Software Tester | PwC –
Enjoyable – sadly online and not in person
Rated 5 out of 5
Iulia Olaru| Test Engineer Apprentice – Functional tester| IBM –
I really enjoyed the course, although it was fast paced, every topic was covered and explained perfectly with plenty of practical exercises.
Rated 5 out of 5
Nithya Anantharaman| Test Manager| KPMG UK –
The course certainly covers the basics – all different areas specific to mobile testing, would have been more insightful to see an application of this perhaps via a case study.
If you are attending a classroom course, then this will be taken at our many training centres within the UK. Our London location is Minories London EC3N 1BJ
E-learning is s training, learning, or education delivered online through a computer or any other digital device, where you can work through the course at your own pace.
Online Exams The remote web proctor solution allows you to take your exams online, using a webcam, microphone and a stable internet connection. You can schedule your exam in advance, at a date and time of your choice. At the agreed time you will connect with a proctor who will invigilate your exam live. View More info here https://tinyurl.com/mr22kry9
A Pearson VUE exam voucher A pearson VUE exam voucher enables you to book and sit your exam at your local Pearson VUE testing centre at a time and date convenient to you. Pearson VUE centres are worldwide, and you will be able to choose the closest testing centre to you. View More info here https://tinyurl.com/2mhn5ust
Virtual classroom is like being in a classroom where students gather, except you will be in your home, office, or other place of your choice.
Pass Protect, offered by TSG Training, is a valuable option for those concerned about the possibility of not passing their exam on the first attempt. It acts like an insurance policy, allowing you to resit your exam at a significantly reduced rate. Pass Protect covers one resit per exam purchased, so you don’t have to worry about the cost of an additional attempt if you don’t pass initially.
Enquire Now
Wait! Before You Leave.
How can we help?
Would you like to know more? Click here to arrange a call back with one of our business development managers. They will be able to discuss the course with you and answer any questions you have.
Roxanne Green| Test Analyst|ReAssure –
The course was really good, definitely would like the practical side of it to help inbed the detail a little more and have some hands on experience. Theory side of it was intense but really informative and retained a good pace with examples along the way to help apply the information.
Mitchell Munter | | –
Well presented and good feedback when going through the mock exams.
Faye Harrison | Systems Delivery Specialist | The Best Connection Group Ltd –
Great course and excellent tutor. John was really welcoming and I immediately felt comfortable. The pace at which he did his lectures was perfect. The content was really detailed and I learned lots of useful theory
Izzy Smith | Junior QA Analyst | TMAC –
Interesting course, good detail & nice practical uses
maybe update some of the slides to more relevant examples/ applications
Simon Evans | QA Software Test engineer | DAC Beachcroft –
Really useful and interesting
Yat Wan | Test Lead | Royal Mail Group –
Trainer has been informative, provided good examples related to theory, and helped me go over where I went wrong in the past paper.
Perhaps more organised setup for delegates in installing and using Android Studio, before course started.
Daniel Phillips | Automation Engineer | Capgemini –
Course was interesting, but practical work didn’t always seem to align with the examinable content – on day 1 a lot of the content was gone over relatively quickly in favor of doing practical work around drawing diagrams. What was implemented on day 2 was better, theory was taught first and then backed up by relevant practical work afterwards.
Danny Yau | Application Tester | Steve Vick International –
Course was great, Rosie was very helpful and always explaining everything in detail.
james troup | software test engineer | IBM –
I thought that our trainer was very good, she was very helpful and the amount of information was a good amount and not overpowering.
Luke Rogers | Software Test Engineer | IBM –
It was very enjoyable and insightful, the information from the trainer helped relate the course information into real world scenarios easily to help understand the details of the course.
Susie Harrison | Software Test Engineer | IBM –
The course was interactive and fun
Lots of information but was not overwhelming
Abdulelah Alkhorayef | Quality assurance | Elm –
A little bit out dated
Kristian Easton|Test Engineer|IBM –
She was a really good speaker and went into really good detail on examples and explanation and got everyone involved
Elton Araunjo|Software test engineer|IBM –
The course was excellent and was able to increase my knowledge bank in test. The course also helped my build on the knowledge that i gained from the foundation course, by helping me understand how testing take place on a mobile app.
Joe Dobson|Test Engineer|IBM –
Really good course, and really explained by a fun instructor. Angelina got us involved however possible and made sure were all comfortable with the pace and info before moving on. She also showed us a demo at the end which was very interesting. Hope to have Angelina teaching me again in future.
Sunny Yang | Digital Consultant | KPMG –
Angelina was very helpful in answering our questions and keeping everyone engaged throughout the whole 4 days. I believe it would be better to keep it as 4 days (I heard some of these run for three days only), and perhaps it would be easier to use Microsoft Teams instead of GoTo Meetings? As we use Teams as our primary source of communication within the organisation anyway.
Ana Ferreira | Business Tester | Siemens –
Good structure, nice explained
Ana Cavaco | Software Tester | Siemens SA –
Really useful and with connection to the real world, not just academic knowledge
Mauricio Geraldelli | | Siemens Portugal –
Great course, but too many info for 2 days (as usual). It will take some time to review and process the content.
Joaquim Fragoso | SW Test and Automation expert | Siemens SA –
Very comprehensive. A reference for mobile testing world
James Anderson | QA Tester Apprentice | Invotra LTD –
The course was very informative and help me learn more about mobile app testing. The course was informative and fun and the trainer was motivating and was very helpful in explaining the syllabus.
Patrick Wilson | Test Analyst | IBM –
Lovely person, very approachable with a deep understanding of the topic, allowing Angelina to explain the content in a way that was engaging, and made it easy to digest. It was easy to stay engaged with the content right through to the end, and the overall course quality was very high.
Thomas Rey | Junior QA Analyst | Jagex –
As I have only taken the foundation course before I was unsure of what to expect with this course. The foundation course was a lot bulkier but this course felt a lot lighter. _x000D_
_x000D_
As I predominately work with mobile devices in my testing I feel I knew a quite about about some of the topics we discussed but I was able to grow a deeper understanding of areas I knew already and I learnt a lot about areas I didn’t know about. _x000D_
_x000D_
I enjoyed the length of the course it felt just right.
peter wilson | software tester | vaultex –
turning the course into a 3 day course be be really good to much info for just 2 days
Lee Palmer | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Overall I felt the course could have done with being an extra day in length. We skipped over most of the practical exercies as well as some of the final topic being sped through the make up the time. This seemed due to us asking lots of questions for the first part of the course which meant we were playing catchup_x000D_
_x000D_
I felt on this course I missed out on having the slides/course sylabus as a physical copy in front of me that I could highlight and make notes on. This time around I was having to make notes from the slides and then also make notes about this slides at the same time. This was exhausting and I stuggled to keep up.
Ryan Neave | QA Analyst | Jagex LTD –
Course was informative._x000D_
_x000D_
I found that this course, in particular in the second day there was a lot crammed into one day with little time to discuss a great deal of things._x000D_
_x000D_
If it was spread over 3 days I believe it would have been digested a lot better.
Amparo Baviera Vivó | IT Test coordinator | European Parliament –
The trainer was very competent. For every concept she explained and put examples to help to understand. The course material is also complete.
It was a little bit difficult to me to follow the speed rate of an English native speaker, but that it’s another story. I enjoyed the course.
Alexander Hendrick | Software Test Apprentice | IBM –
The course was intensive but very interesting. Angelina came at it with a positive attitude and did well explaining the material in detail. She was very patient with us and got through the course material in a good time.
George Selway|Software Tester Apprentice|Sedgemoor District Council –
It was easy to follow and the instructor was very friendly and patient.
Toni Lampert | Apprentice Software Tester | Booking.com –
It is very informative and allowed you to highlight the areas that you need to study in more detail for the exam. At times we would get lost in the practical that doesn’t relate back to the exam
Duncan MacGregor | IT Technician | OS –
Course was excellent, well paced, superb instructor and feel like I learned a lot.
Darrell Cole | QA | MoneyBox –
Good overview plenty to learn lots of Fun
Marc Ackermans|| –
I couldn’t hope for a better trainer! Being a non English native speaker I was afraid the course would have been a big challenge but Angelina has made this course for me easy to understand making sure I wasn’t left behind. She has clarified each doubt and on top of that she’s also good fun. I hope I will meet Angelina in a future course.
Mark Whitby|Head of Development and Testing|InHealth Intelligence –
Course was excellent. The trainer was energetic and engaging.
Madelaine Helleur O’Connor|Graduate Data and Technology Consultant|KPMG –
I was very happy with the way the course was presented._x000D_
By asking everyone questions during the course Angelina made sure we all stayed focused (at lease it worked for me).
Kieran Hooper|Business Consultant|IBM –
The course is quite clear, sometimes a bit internet connection issue. The content is quite good
Joshua Lovejoy|Test Analyst|University of Southampton –
Angelina was very knowledgeable and presented the course with lots of energy and humour.
Colin McNairney|Test Automation Specialist|IBM UK –
Course was very good, but difficult for me to follow as I am deaf in both ears and had difficulty keeping up with what was going on. I depend mainly on text and slides, but suffered some confusion as I did not have context in some situations.
Thomas Collins|Software Tester|Aareon –
Angelina was very friendly and approachable, she was happy to answer any queries that I had as we went along. I was initially a bit worried about remote learning, but things went very well. Angelina tried to make the course as interactive as possible, even though I know that it is hard to do this remotely. Thanks Angelina 🙂
Sophie Pearson|PTP Business Analyst|Old Mutual Wealth –
It is very informative and allowed you to highlight the areas that you need to study in more detail for the exam. At times we would get lost in the practical that doesn’t relate back to the exam
George Selway|Software Tester Apprentice|Sedgemoor District Council –
It was easy to follow and the instructor was very friendly and patient. There was a great case study to follow with linked tasks.
George Selway|Software Tester Apprentice|Sedgemoor District Council –
It was easy to follow and the instructor was very friendly and patient. There was a great case study to follow with linked tasks.
Duncan MacGregor|IT Technician|OS –
Course was excellent, well paced, superb instructor and feel like I learned a lot.
Darrell Cole|QA|Moneyhub –
Good overview plenty to learn lots of Fun
Attila Pal|Data administrator|Randstad –
I had a virtual course between 18-20 May and really enjoyed it. I had already prepared from a book but John, the trainer, helped me with topics I was not confident in. In my opinion, the course was well structured and interactive enough – we had optimal break times, practiced sample questions, had explaining discussions and Q-A sessions all 3 days. It was better than just reading the book, I understood the material more because of visualising and pointing out the major correlations. I took my exam 2 days after this course and had 90% (probably around 20-25% more than if preparing from the book only)!
Joe Verlander | Software Tester | PwC –
Enjoyable – sadly online and not in person
Iulia Olaru| Test Engineer Apprentice – Functional tester| IBM –
I really enjoyed the course, although it was fast paced, every topic was covered and explained perfectly with plenty of practical exercises.
Nithya Anantharaman| Test Manager| KPMG UK –
The course certainly covers the basics – all different areas specific to mobile testing, would have been more insightful to see an application of this perhaps via a case study.