The ISTQB Agile Foundation Extension Certification course extends the broad understanding of testing acquired at Foundation Level and covers those topics which are considered to be essential knowledge for a test professional working on agile projects.
This intensive two-day tutor-led course contains lectures, exercises and practical work and includes a high proportion of hands-on practical team-based activities to allow candidates to get a true feel for how agile projects work in the real world. This course has been rated at SFIAplus level 4.
Who is it for?
The Agile Tester Foundation level course is suitable for those who are, or expect to be, working on agile projects. It is aimed at those who seek a practical application of the core software testing material covered at ISTQB Foundation level to agile projects.
This course is also appropriate for anyone who wants a deeper understanding of agile development that specifically contains coverage of the options for including software testing as an integrated part of the agile development approach. This includes Scrum Masters, project managers, release managers, quality managers, software development managers, business analysts and management consultants.
About ISTQB and the ‘Certified Tester’ Scheme
Founded in 2002, ISTQB (International Software Testing Qualifications Board) is a not-for-profit association comprising 47 national boards (including the UKTB) covering 71 countries worldwide.
ISTQB has defined the Advanced certification as part of their ‘Certified Tester’ scheme that, with over 240,000 certifications, has become the de facto world-wide standard for software testing qualifications.
The ‘Certified Tester’ scheme:
provides a set of professional qualifications widely-recognised by employers, customers and peers;
enables software suppliers to hire and train certified testers and thereby gain commercial advantage over their competitors by advertising their tester recruitment and development policies; and
enables comparison of testing skills across different countries, testers to move across country borders more easily, and multi-national/international projects to have a common understanding of testing issues.
Entry Requirements
The entry requirements for the Certified Tester Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester qualification are that the candidate must hold the ISTQB Foundation Certificate in Software Testing.
Note that it is recommended that you attend an accredited training course run by an accredited training provider, as the overall exam pass rates are notably higher for candidates attending such courses.
The Exam
To qualify as an internationally-recognized Certified Foundation Agile Extension Level Tester and be issued with an ISTQB® Agile Foundation Extension Level Certificate, delegates must successfully pass the exam administered by the relevant National Board or Examination Provider.
The exam will be taken on the afternoon of the last day of the course.
The examination consists of a one-hour exam with 40 multiple choice questions.
It will be a ‘closed book’ examination i.e. no notes or books will be allowed into the examination room.
Duration of 60 minutes (or 75 minutes for candidates taking examinations that are not in their native language). The pass mark is 65% (26 out of 40).
Next steps
The Advanced Level establishes a platform from which further skills and knowledge may be acquired at the Expert Level. Holders of the Advanced Agile Technical Tester qualification will be eligible to continue with other Advanced exams as well as progressing to Expert level qualifications, such as Test Automation and Security Testing. More details to follow when available.
Holders of the Certified Tester Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester qualification may also wish to consider the other Advanced Level qualifications, Test Manager, Agile Technical Tester, Test Analyst, Test Automation Engineer and Security Tester
Course Objectives
After successfully completing the course and passing the exam, delegates should be able to demonstrate the following business-based outcomes:
Collaborate in a cross-functional Agile team being familiar with principles and basic practices of Agile software development.
Adapt existing testing experience and knowledge to Agile values and principles.
Support the Agile team in planning test-related activities.
Apply relevant methods and techniques for testing in an Agile project.
Assist the Agile team in test automation activities.
Assist business stakeholders in defining understandable and testable user stories, scenarios, requirements and acceptance criteria as appropriate.
Work and share information with other team members using effective communication styles and channels.
In general, a Certified Tester Foundation Level – Agile Tester is expected to have acquired the necessary skills to working effectively within an Agile team and environment.
In addition, Foundation level Agile Testers should be able to demonstrate their skills in the following areas once they have completed the course and passed the exam:
The Fundamentals of Agile Software Development
The different agile approaches
The Differences between Testing in Traditional and Agile Approaches
Testing in Agile Projects
Roles and skills of a tester in Agile Projects
Agile testing techniques and methods
Assess product quality risks within an Agile project
Estimate testing effort based on iteration content and quality risks
Tools in Agile Projects
Syllabus – Key points
52 reviews for ISTQB Agile Foundation Extension
Rated 5 out of 5
Qasim Mahood | QA Engineer | Moneybox –
Great course – it was interesting with good learning materials. Trainer was great, engaging, fun and very knowledgeable. Would highly recommend
Rated 4 out of 5
Luke Amis | Test Manager | Eurostar –
Great course but somewhat challanging working through the course material, jumping around to find questions. Some of the example questions were not clear.
Rated 5 out of 5
Karl Gwilliam | IT QA Lead | Deloitte –
The training was excellent
Rated 5 out of 5
Robert Gale | QA Manager | Deloitte –
Very good course, current circumstances aren’t great for classroom based learning and would have preferred to be face to face but Rosie did the best she could. Material is of a good quality
Rated 5 out of 5
gomathy govindaswamy | Senior Test Analyst |wundermanthompson –
It was a good class room session and John did take time to explain things until we understood. Was a very useful session and gave us a lot of ideas and tips for the exam prep.
Rated 5 out of 5
Chinelo Oji | QAT Test Analyst |Home Office –
I enjoyed the course and found it very useful. John was quite clear and concise with his explanation. Very Helpful, courteous, patience and professional. Also provided a good examination tips.
Rated 5 out of 5
Kumara Sankar | Tester Manual |WTC –
He had a clear understanding of what he was teaching. His presentation was clear and precise. And clarified our doubts . Thank you
Rated 5 out of 5
Philippa Hodge | Automation Tester |WTC –
Very hard to deliver this online so John did a fine job of giving us what we need to hopefully pass the exam.
Rated 5 out of 5
Fola Olagunju | Senior Test Analyst |WTC –
Well rounded course with good explanations to go with each slide
Rated 5 out of 5
Luke Goodridge | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Very well done, was clear on all aspects, ready for my exam
Rated 5 out of 5
Vytautas Januskevicius | QA Analyst | Jagex –
John was great at explaining the course, good and informative. Great at explaining exam questions.
Rated 5 out of 5
steph scanlon | Principal QA Analyst | Jagex –
John is a fantastic trainer, if only I had John for my foundation course many moons ago! Everything on the course was fully explained to us in a way the group could understand and no question felt “stupid”.
I hope to have John training me in future courses as I now feel more ready to take on my exam.
Rated 5 out of 5
Andrew Churcher | Senior QA Engineer | Jagex –
The hand written notes could be difficult to read at times, would suggest a thinner tip on the pen.
Rated 5 out of 5
Kristina Savciuk | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Course was great!
Rated 5 out of 5
Philip White | QA Analyst | Jagex –
The course was well paced, with questions intermittently breaking up sections of listening, confirming that the information conveyed was taken in and gave opportunity to question anything that may not have been understood.
Being an online course, I found it very uncomfortable that neither the attendees nor the trainer had cameras on, as I couldn’t read body language or get other visual cues to inform when and where I could or should speak.
Regular breaks were appreciated as they allowed some space for a bit of a mental refresh and time away from a screen.
Rated 4 out of 5
Simon Wright | Programme Test Manager | Capgemini –
The course content was good, unfortunately it felt like it was designed for a classroom delivery rather than online and this was difficult as things that would probably have been really good discussions in a classroom did not transpire to be so good online.
Rated 5 out of 5
Saskia Cope | Test Lead | Capgemini –
Very informative, each slide described in detail to support with the exam questions. Would be good to go through more exam questions during the course and perhaps less exercises.
Rated 5 out of 5
Scott Newberry | Test Team Lead | IDBS –
Engaging, thought-provoking presentation of various aspects of security testing
Rated 4 out of 5
Robert Macdonald | Software Test Apprentice | IBM –
I thought it felt more like a second ISTQB course rather than a Agile course, but either way enjoyed it and felt like I learnt a lot from it.
I think to improve, it would be really helpful just to have a final slide with the definitions of some of the key words/topics and maybe summarize the main differences between similar topics (like release and iteration charts)
Rated 4 out of 5
Nathan Grabham | Test Engineer | Principality –
Good information although its too much to digest in just two days.
Rated 5 out of 5
Philip Wright | Test Engineer | Principality Building Society –
Enjoyed the course but the exam questions I found could be very open to interpretation (Cases being ‘BEST’ or ‘MOST LIKELY’).
Rated 4 out of 5
Katie Stanford | Junior QA Analysis | Jagex –
I enjoyed the course, considering it was digital and not in a classroom which i personally prefer. Trainer was very helpful. Only this is please avoid having so many ‘need more context’ questions in sample papers, as they dont help and just make me personally feel dumb.
Rated 4 out of 5
Graeme Churchman | Junior SDET | Jagex –
Information was clear, but did feel like some parts were skipped over more than others (possibly as they are less important / unlikely to be in the exam). I would have liked to do more practice questions (5-10) at the end of each section as I find this helps me cement the learning that just took place, rather than doing one or two questions along with all others at the end.
I would have liked a little more exam technique training, or advice on the sort of questions that would have been asked (this could have been covered by the above additional practice questions).
I was also disappointed that the practice questions were not like the exam questions, either not in the same format (select multiple answers) or wouldn’t have been selected for the exam as they didn’t have enough context.
Finally John himself was very friendly and I would do training with him again, though I have to admit I did find it quite difficult to read his handwriting some times!
Rated 4 out of 5
Connor Lines | QA Engineer | Jagex –
Trainer was pleasant and knowledgeable on the subject matter. Course material was covered at a good rate. A number of the questions in the sample exam material were poorly phrased, our trainer even agreed they would be unlikely to appears as phrased in a real exam. This made the sample questions, and the time take to review them feel extremely counter productive.
Rated 5 out of 5
Dylan Whyte | QA Lead | Jagex –
John is a great trainer, he is good at explaining and is always happy to answer questions.
My problems are with the TSG mock exam questions. I’m dyslexic and a good 6/36 requires having an intimate understanding of the nuances of the English language to decipher. I understand that some of the questions are supposed to be tricky but they are way different to the actual exam from my experience. I think the training exam is a red herring that adds unnecessary stress to an already information heavy training course. I would like to be able to understand the question and apply my knowledge instead of tripping up due to the sheer complexity and long-winded unhelpful questions. It’s demoralising and makes me feel don’t understand anything. The majority of the time, if the question is re-worded I can answer the question and get it right with no issues.
I would not have an issue if the questions were long but concise but there are lots of connecting words and double negatives that create a labyrinth of potential misinterpretations.
I just believe the jumping through hoops to try understand a question is pointless and unnecessary.
Sorry for my very cynical feedback but this is how I feel.
Just a heads up about this form, you can tick all the options in the “how would you rate your trainer.”
Cheers,
Rated 5 out of 5
Byron Phillips | QA | Principality Building Society –
Course is good and a lot to learn, what does concern me is that some of the exam questions are intended to catch you out rather than based on the learning material
Rated 5 out of 5
Ian Parsons | QA Test Analyst | Principality Building Society –
Surprised as to the content – a lot of focus on the fundamentals and machinations of Agile as opposed to Agile testing, but suppose I would have realised that had I thoroughly checked the syllabus first. Pitched at a good level given the range of agile experience in the training group. Not overly happy with the wording/rationale for some of the sample exam questions.
Rated 5 out of 5
Bruno Carapinha | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Went through the syllabus to good detail and explained the contents well. Also appreciated that he went through all of the mock exam questions and explained not only why some of the answers were correct, but why the other answers were incorrect.
Rated 3 out of 5
Marc Williams | QA COP Manager | Principality –
Good and relevant content
Rated 5 out of 5
Emrys Ruck | Software Tester | IBM –
Good course with a helpful and patient instructor
Rated 4 out of 5
Tom Rutter|Test Analyst|Key Group –
Nice and informative
Rated 5 out of 5
Val Panesar|Test Consultant|Capgemini (Sogeti) –
A good walkthrough of the syllabus with lots of interaction with everyone. Really great tips for dealing with the exam questions with examples done during the course.
Rated 5 out of 5
Ellen Mandevhana|Software Test Analyst|Iris software Group –
Had a good understating of Agile aspects
Rated 5 out of 5
James Schofield|| –
Very detailed and well paced course
Rated 4 out of 5
Nimish Bhatnagar|Portfolio Test Manager|Sogeti UK –
the course was good but a few more insights to the real world application would be good
Rated 5 out of 5
Dylan Anderson|Software Tester Apprentice|RWE Supply and Trading –
Really good course. Provides plenty of information for the agile testing area and it benefits me for my journey as a Software Tester Apprentice.
Rated 5 out of 5
Alex Marr|Senior Test Analyst|Cap Gemini –
Great course. Especially enjoyed the interactive parts, comparing the delegates’ experiences to the course material. Also appreciated that the information presented in the course didn’t duplicate the written information in the syllabus, but instead was an interpretation of it with practical examples, to aid learning.
Course materials and joining instructions were clear and helpful.
Rated 5 out of 5
Manak Dev|Lead Quality Assurance and Test Delivery Owner|UK Home Office –
Top bloke, explained things well. Engaged with the class and made it as interactive as possible. Thanks for going through this
Rated 5 out of 5
Andrew Scott|Management Consultant|Capgemini –
A very good course delivered at a good and friendly pace
Rated 4 out of 5
saleem alrashdi|expert|CITC –
good course
Rated 5 out of 5
Tânia Charneca|Senior QA & Support Analyst|Akerolabs –
It was very engaging, the trainer can keep everyone interested and engaged. Really recommend!
Rated 5 out of 5
Marco Venzelaar|Managing Consultant & Lead Technologist|Sogeti –
Well delivered, clear and precise. I would like to have instead of the answer sheet to have instead a duplicate of the question sheet with EACH answer why it is wrong or right
A.) Answer text A
WRONG: this is the reason
B.) Answer text B
WRONG: this is another reason
C.) Answer text C
RIGHT: Short description why this is right with link to the syllabus section
D.) Answer text D
WRONG: this is the reason
This was done in an Harvard Online Business Exam and this is very helpful.
Rated 5 out of 5
Jonathan pitt|Managing Consultant ( Test Manager )|Sogeti –
Found it interesting and informative and useful to help support future projects I work on
Rated 5 out of 5
Srimaye Nallamsetty|Test Engineer|Trakcel –
Course was really fun and interactive with an open discussion which helps in real world
Rated 5 out of 5
Jermaine Amani|Test Consultant|Sogeti –
Well paced and very informative.
Rated 5 out of 5
Alannah Russell|Acceptance Test Analyst|SSE OVO –
Angelina is very knowledgeable and had expertise in all areas. Angelina engaged everyone at all times which kept everyone interested, I am sure I speak on behalf of everyone here.
Rated 5 out of 5
Avanish Vaghela|QA Lead|MetadataWorks –
Excellent course. Very informative, interactive and fun. Really enjoyed the learning from Angelina.
Rated 5 out of 5
Velan Chinnaiah|Test Consultant|Sogeti UK –
Training content is good and Rosie did impart the training effectively.
She did clear all the doubts we had.
This has increased my confidence in taking the exam.
Thank you Rosie.
Rated 5 out of 5
Gayathiri Mani|Principal Consultant|Sogeti –
I have gone through 2 days of online course. I really liked the course syllabus and the order they covered both Day1 and Day2. Liked the exam questions we take in between the courses. Would like to have more sample questions and answers, which will help us more, in terms of clearing the exam.
Rated 3 out of 5
Paul Incles|Service Operations Analyst|Rail Delivery Group –
A little too much talking about real world as opposed to sticking purely to the syllabus
Rated 5 out of 5
Gaurav Prabhu|Test Manager|Sogeti UK –
Excellent course with great examples
Rated 5 out of 5
James Anderson|QA Tester Apprentice|Invotra LTD –
The course was very informative and helped me increase my knowledge in relation to Agile development cycles.
Qasim Mahood | QA Engineer | Moneybox –
Great course – it was interesting with good learning materials. Trainer was great, engaging, fun and very knowledgeable. Would highly recommend
Luke Amis | Test Manager | Eurostar –
Great course but somewhat challanging working through the course material, jumping around to find questions. Some of the example questions were not clear.
Karl Gwilliam | IT QA Lead | Deloitte –
The training was excellent
Robert Gale | QA Manager | Deloitte –
Very good course, current circumstances aren’t great for classroom based learning and would have preferred to be face to face but Rosie did the best she could. Material is of a good quality
gomathy govindaswamy | Senior Test Analyst |wundermanthompson –
It was a good class room session and John did take time to explain things until we understood. Was a very useful session and gave us a lot of ideas and tips for the exam prep.
Chinelo Oji | QAT Test Analyst |Home Office –
I enjoyed the course and found it very useful. John was quite clear and concise with his explanation. Very Helpful, courteous, patience and professional. Also provided a good examination tips.
Kumara Sankar | Tester Manual |WTC –
He had a clear understanding of what he was teaching. His presentation was clear and precise. And clarified our doubts . Thank you
Philippa Hodge | Automation Tester |WTC –
Very hard to deliver this online so John did a fine job of giving us what we need to hopefully pass the exam.
Fola Olagunju | Senior Test Analyst |WTC –
Well rounded course with good explanations to go with each slide
Luke Goodridge | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Very well done, was clear on all aspects, ready for my exam
Vytautas Januskevicius | QA Analyst | Jagex –
John was great at explaining the course, good and informative. Great at explaining exam questions.
steph scanlon | Principal QA Analyst | Jagex –
John is a fantastic trainer, if only I had John for my foundation course many moons ago! Everything on the course was fully explained to us in a way the group could understand and no question felt “stupid”.
I hope to have John training me in future courses as I now feel more ready to take on my exam.
Andrew Churcher | Senior QA Engineer | Jagex –
The hand written notes could be difficult to read at times, would suggest a thinner tip on the pen.
Kristina Savciuk | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Course was great!
Philip White | QA Analyst | Jagex –
The course was well paced, with questions intermittently breaking up sections of listening, confirming that the information conveyed was taken in and gave opportunity to question anything that may not have been understood.
Being an online course, I found it very uncomfortable that neither the attendees nor the trainer had cameras on, as I couldn’t read body language or get other visual cues to inform when and where I could or should speak.
Regular breaks were appreciated as they allowed some space for a bit of a mental refresh and time away from a screen.
Simon Wright | Programme Test Manager | Capgemini –
The course content was good, unfortunately it felt like it was designed for a classroom delivery rather than online and this was difficult as things that would probably have been really good discussions in a classroom did not transpire to be so good online.
Saskia Cope | Test Lead | Capgemini –
Very informative, each slide described in detail to support with the exam questions. Would be good to go through more exam questions during the course and perhaps less exercises.
Scott Newberry | Test Team Lead | IDBS –
Engaging, thought-provoking presentation of various aspects of security testing
Robert Macdonald | Software Test Apprentice | IBM –
I thought it felt more like a second ISTQB course rather than a Agile course, but either way enjoyed it and felt like I learnt a lot from it.
I think to improve, it would be really helpful just to have a final slide with the definitions of some of the key words/topics and maybe summarize the main differences between similar topics (like release and iteration charts)
Nathan Grabham | Test Engineer | Principality –
Good information although its too much to digest in just two days.
Philip Wright | Test Engineer | Principality Building Society –
Enjoyed the course but the exam questions I found could be very open to interpretation (Cases being ‘BEST’ or ‘MOST LIKELY’).
Katie Stanford | Junior QA Analysis | Jagex –
I enjoyed the course, considering it was digital and not in a classroom which i personally prefer. Trainer was very helpful. Only this is please avoid having so many ‘need more context’ questions in sample papers, as they dont help and just make me personally feel dumb.
Graeme Churchman | Junior SDET | Jagex –
Information was clear, but did feel like some parts were skipped over more than others (possibly as they are less important / unlikely to be in the exam). I would have liked to do more practice questions (5-10) at the end of each section as I find this helps me cement the learning that just took place, rather than doing one or two questions along with all others at the end.
I would have liked a little more exam technique training, or advice on the sort of questions that would have been asked (this could have been covered by the above additional practice questions).
I was also disappointed that the practice questions were not like the exam questions, either not in the same format (select multiple answers) or wouldn’t have been selected for the exam as they didn’t have enough context.
Finally John himself was very friendly and I would do training with him again, though I have to admit I did find it quite difficult to read his handwriting some times!
Connor Lines | QA Engineer | Jagex –
Trainer was pleasant and knowledgeable on the subject matter. Course material was covered at a good rate. A number of the questions in the sample exam material were poorly phrased, our trainer even agreed they would be unlikely to appears as phrased in a real exam. This made the sample questions, and the time take to review them feel extremely counter productive.
Dylan Whyte | QA Lead | Jagex –
John is a great trainer, he is good at explaining and is always happy to answer questions.
My problems are with the TSG mock exam questions. I’m dyslexic and a good 6/36 requires having an intimate understanding of the nuances of the English language to decipher. I understand that some of the questions are supposed to be tricky but they are way different to the actual exam from my experience. I think the training exam is a red herring that adds unnecessary stress to an already information heavy training course. I would like to be able to understand the question and apply my knowledge instead of tripping up due to the sheer complexity and long-winded unhelpful questions. It’s demoralising and makes me feel don’t understand anything. The majority of the time, if the question is re-worded I can answer the question and get it right with no issues.
I would not have an issue if the questions were long but concise but there are lots of connecting words and double negatives that create a labyrinth of potential misinterpretations.
I just believe the jumping through hoops to try understand a question is pointless and unnecessary.
Sorry for my very cynical feedback but this is how I feel.
Just a heads up about this form, you can tick all the options in the “how would you rate your trainer.”
Cheers,
Byron Phillips | QA | Principality Building Society –
Course is good and a lot to learn, what does concern me is that some of the exam questions are intended to catch you out rather than based on the learning material
Ian Parsons | QA Test Analyst | Principality Building Society –
Surprised as to the content – a lot of focus on the fundamentals and machinations of Agile as opposed to Agile testing, but suppose I would have realised that had I thoroughly checked the syllabus first. Pitched at a good level given the range of agile experience in the training group. Not overly happy with the wording/rationale for some of the sample exam questions.
Bruno Carapinha | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Went through the syllabus to good detail and explained the contents well. Also appreciated that he went through all of the mock exam questions and explained not only why some of the answers were correct, but why the other answers were incorrect.
Marc Williams | QA COP Manager | Principality –
Good and relevant content
Emrys Ruck | Software Tester | IBM –
Good course with a helpful and patient instructor
Tom Rutter|Test Analyst|Key Group –
Nice and informative
Val Panesar|Test Consultant|Capgemini (Sogeti) –
A good walkthrough of the syllabus with lots of interaction with everyone. Really great tips for dealing with the exam questions with examples done during the course.
Ellen Mandevhana|Software Test Analyst|Iris software Group –
Had a good understating of Agile aspects
James Schofield|| –
Very detailed and well paced course
Nimish Bhatnagar|Portfolio Test Manager|Sogeti UK –
the course was good but a few more insights to the real world application would be good
Dylan Anderson|Software Tester Apprentice|RWE Supply and Trading –
Really good course. Provides plenty of information for the agile testing area and it benefits me for my journey as a Software Tester Apprentice.
Alex Marr|Senior Test Analyst|Cap Gemini –
Great course. Especially enjoyed the interactive parts, comparing the delegates’ experiences to the course material. Also appreciated that the information presented in the course didn’t duplicate the written information in the syllabus, but instead was an interpretation of it with practical examples, to aid learning.
Course materials and joining instructions were clear and helpful.
Manak Dev|Lead Quality Assurance and Test Delivery Owner|UK Home Office –
Top bloke, explained things well. Engaged with the class and made it as interactive as possible. Thanks for going through this
Andrew Scott|Management Consultant|Capgemini –
A very good course delivered at a good and friendly pace
saleem alrashdi|expert|CITC –
good course
Tânia Charneca|Senior QA & Support Analyst|Akerolabs –
It was very engaging, the trainer can keep everyone interested and engaged. Really recommend!
Marco Venzelaar|Managing Consultant & Lead Technologist|Sogeti –
Well delivered, clear and precise. I would like to have instead of the answer sheet to have instead a duplicate of the question sheet with EACH answer why it is wrong or right
A.) Answer text A
WRONG: this is the reason
B.) Answer text B
WRONG: this is another reason
C.) Answer text C
RIGHT: Short description why this is right with link to the syllabus section
D.) Answer text D
WRONG: this is the reason
This was done in an Harvard Online Business Exam and this is very helpful.
Jonathan pitt|Managing Consultant ( Test Manager )|Sogeti –
Found it interesting and informative and useful to help support future projects I work on
Srimaye Nallamsetty|Test Engineer|Trakcel –
Course was really fun and interactive with an open discussion which helps in real world
Jermaine Amani|Test Consultant|Sogeti –
Well paced and very informative.
Alannah Russell|Acceptance Test Analyst|SSE OVO –
Angelina is very knowledgeable and had expertise in all areas. Angelina engaged everyone at all times which kept everyone interested, I am sure I speak on behalf of everyone here.
Avanish Vaghela|QA Lead|MetadataWorks –
Excellent course. Very informative, interactive and fun. Really enjoyed the learning from Angelina.
Velan Chinnaiah|Test Consultant|Sogeti UK –
Training content is good and Rosie did impart the training effectively.
She did clear all the doubts we had.
This has increased my confidence in taking the exam.
Thank you Rosie.
Gayathiri Mani|Principal Consultant|Sogeti –
I have gone through 2 days of online course. I really liked the course syllabus and the order they covered both Day1 and Day2. Liked the exam questions we take in between the courses. Would like to have more sample questions and answers, which will help us more, in terms of clearing the exam.
Paul Incles|Service Operations Analyst|Rail Delivery Group –
A little too much talking about real world as opposed to sticking purely to the syllabus
Gaurav Prabhu|Test Manager|Sogeti UK –
Excellent course with great examples
James Anderson|QA Tester Apprentice|Invotra LTD –
The course was very informative and helped me increase my knowledge in relation to Agile development cycles.